Pharmacognosy Magazine
Search Article 
Advanced search 
   Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research
Home  |  About us  |  Editorial board  |  Search  |  Ahead of print  |  Current Issue  |  Archives  |  Instructions  |  Subscribe  |  Contact us |    Login  Users online: 16
Home Print this page Email this page Small font sizeDefault font sizeIncrease font size
Year : 2012  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 46-51

An alternative subcoronary implantation technique decreases the risk of complete heart block after stentless aortic valve replacement

1 Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Changhai Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
2 Swedish Heart and Vascular Institute, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
3 Division of Cardiac Surgery, The University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada

Correspondence Address:
Shaohua Wang
2H2.34 Walter Mackenzie Centre, 8440 - 112th Street, Edmonton, AB - T6G 2B7
Login to access the Email id

DOI: 10.4103/0975-3583.91594

PMID: 22346147

Get Permissions

Context: Stentless aortic valve prostheses have excellent hemodynamic profiles, but may be associated with an increased postoperative heart block when compared to conventional prostheses. Aims: To assess the effect of an alternative subcoronary implantation technique on postoperative complete heart block (CHB) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) following aortic valve replacement (AVR) with stentless tissue valves. Settings and Design: A total of 130 consecutive patients undergoing AVR with stentless tissue valves by a single surgeon were studied retrospectively. Materials and Methods: A stentless tissue valve was implanted into 80 patients using the conventional modified subcoronary implantation technique, and 50 patients received a stentless tissue valve by an alternative subcoronary technique in which the inflow suture line is raised at the level of right-non coronary commissure. Data were collected at the time of hospital discharge and at 6-12 months postoperatively. Statistical Analysis Used: Independent samples t-test was used to compare continuous variables, and categorical variables were compared with the chi-square test. Results: Use of this new method reduced postoperative CHB (4.0% vs. 16.3%, P = 0.033), with fewer patients requiring PPI in the early postoperative period (6.0% vs. 18.8%, P = 0.041). Echocardiographic examination showed no differences in the effective orifice area, peak and mean aortic valve gradients, or left ventricular mass index between groups. Trivial or mild aortic regurgitation was found in 3.9% of patients with the conventional modified technique and 4.0% of patients undergoing the alternative technique, during follow-up (P > 0.05). Conclusions: Compared to the conventional subcoronary implantation technique, the alternative subcoronary implantation technique reduces the incidence of new CHB and the requirement of PPI following AVR with stentless tissue valves while preserving mid-term hemodynamic function.

Print this article     Email this article
Search Again
 Table of Contents
 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
  • Song Z
  • Lehr EJ
  • Wang S
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Article Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert
 Add to My List
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded94    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal